WardenAuthAgent Security
PricingDocsCompareBlogLearnChangelog
Sign inGet started free
Home/Compare/Permit.io
WardenAuth vs Permit.io

Permit.io is built for policy-as-code. WardenAuth is built for multi-tenant SaaS.

Permit.io is a powerful policy management platform with ABAC/RBAC support, a visual policy editor, and GitOps workflows. If you need complex attribute-based policies, it's excellent. But their free tier is hard-capped at 20 tenants and Startup at 100 — most multi-tenant SaaS products hit those limits immediately. WardenAuth has unlimited tenants on every tier.

Overview

Permit.io invests heavily in developer experience around policy management — their UI-based policy editor, GitOps integration, and support for RBAC, ABAC, and ReBAC make it appealing for teams who want non-engineers to manage authorization rules.

For standard multi-tenant SaaS RBAC — roles, permissions, scoped to per-customer workspaces with unlimited tenants — WardenAuth's model is simpler, includes audit and API key management at every tier, and never caps your tenant count.

Permit.io — Strengths

  • Excellent visual policy editor
  • Supports ABAC and complex attribute policies
  • OPA and Cedar integration
  • GitOps-friendly policy-as-code
  • Good audit trail and decision logs

Permit.io — Limitations

  • Free tier is hard-capped at 20 tenants
  • Pricing is MAU-based, not per-check
  • Complex mental model for simple RBAC use cases
  • Policy-as-code adds operational overhead
  • Hosting your own policy engine still required for some features

Pricing comparison

ScenarioPermit.ioWardenAuth
Getting startedFree (≤20 tenants hard cap)Free (unlimited tenants, 50K checks)
1K MAU, 100 tenants$5/mo (Startup, ≤100 tenants)Free (unlimited tenants)
10K MAU, 500 tenants$25/mo Pro (≤20K tenants)$79/mo (Starter, unlimited tenants)
50K MAU, 5K tenants$125/mo Pro + overage$249/mo (Growth, unlimited tenants)
Enterprise / high volumeCustom (no tenant limits)$1,199-$3,499/mo

Feature comparison

FeaturePermit.ioWardenAuth
Fine-grained RBAC
ABAC / ReBAC
Unlimited tenants (all tiers)
Built-in audit trail (40+ events)Decision logs only
API key management + rotation
Deny-wins + decision reasoning
SoD / Approval workflows
SCIM provisioningEnterprise onlyIncluded (Business+)
Self-hosted deploymentEnterprise onlyAvailable (Enterprise)
GitOps / policy-as-code
Visual policy editor
Flat-rate, per-check pricing

Use case guide

Choose Permit.io when:

Choose Permit.io if you need attribute-based access control (ABAC), want a visual policy editor for non-engineers, need GitOps-style policy management, or need integration with OPA/Cedar for existing infrastructure.

Choose WardenAuth when:

Choose WardenAuth if you're building standard SaaS multi-tenant RBAC (roles per workspace, permissions per role), need API key management alongside authorization, want a simpler mental model, and want to start free.

Bottom line

Permit.io is the best choice if you need complex ABAC policies, a visual policy editor, or GitOps workflows for authorization. But if you are building a multi-tenant SaaS product where every customer is a separate tenant — and you need unlimited tenants, built-in audit, API key management, SoD constraints, and flat-rate pricing that does not scale with MAU — WardenAuth is purpose-built for that use case.

See for yourself — no credit card required.

Start for free View all comparisons →

Other comparisons

vs Auth0 FGA (Okta FGA)vs WorkOSvs Cerbosvs Ory Ketovs Casbinvs Open Policy Agent (OPA)vs AWS Verified Permissionsvs Building Your Own Zanzibarvs Styra DASvs SpiceDB (AuthZed)vs Keycloakvs Asertovs Amazon Cedarvs Topaz (Aserto OSS)vs Warrantvs Auth0 FGAvs WorkOSvs Permit.io
© 2026 ecarrizo. All rights reserved.
PricingDocsCompareBlogLearnChangelogStatusGlossaryContactTermsPrivacy