WardenAuthAgent Security
PricingDocsCompareBlogLearnChangelog
Sign inGet started free
Home/Compare/Amazon Cedar
WardenAuth vs Amazon Cedar

Cedar is a beautiful policy language. But it lives inside AWS.

Amazon Cedar is a purpose-built policy language for authorization — cleaner and more intuitive than Rego, with first-class support for RBAC and ABAC patterns. But Cedar is only available through AWS Verified Permissions — locking your authorization layer to AWS. WardenAuth provides the same authorization capabilities cloud-agnostic, with a dashboard instead of a policy language.

Overview

Cedar's design is genuinely good: it separates authorization into a clean, readable syntax with explicit support for role-based and attribute-based patterns. The policy simulator and schema validation are excellent developer experiences.

But Cedar is a policy language, not a platform. You still need AWS Verified Permissions to run it, and you're locked to the AWS ecosystem. WardenAuth models authorization as structured data — roles, permissions, scopes — managed through a dashboard or API, cloud-agnostic.

Amazon Cedar — Strengths

  • Clean, intuitive policy language — purpose-built for authorization
  • Schema validation for policies
  • Built-in policy simulator
  • First-class RBAC and ABAC support
  • Open-source policy language (Apache 2.0)
  • No Turing-complete footguns (unlike Rego)

Amazon Cedar — Limitations

  • Only available through AWS Verified Permissions — AWS lock-in
  • Per-request billing through AVP
  • Still a policy language to learn — barrier for non-engineers
  • No management dashboard — AWS Console only
  • No API key management, SoD, or approvals
  • No multi-tenancy primitives — separate policy stores required

Pricing comparison

ScenarioAmazon CedarWardenAuth
LanguageFree (open-source, Apache 2.0)Free (50K checks, managed)
Runtime (AVP)$0.15/1M requests (beyond free tier)$79/mo (Starter, 1M checks)
Management dashboardAWS ConsoleFull RBAC dashboard

Feature comparison

FeatureAmazon CedarWardenAuth
Fine-grained RBAC
ABAC / attribute conditions
Cedar policy language
ReBAC / relationships
Management dashboardAWS Console
Audit trailCloudTrail (separate)
API key management
Multi-tenant scopes
SoD / Approval workflows
Cloud-agnostic
Self-hosted deploymentAvailable (Enterprise)
Flat-rate pricing

When each makes sense

Choose Amazon Cedar when:

Choose Cedar (via AWS Verified Permissions) if you're fully committed to AWS, want a clean policy language for authorization, and don't need multi-cloud portability. Cedar is genuinely better-designed than Rego for authorization use cases.

Choose WardenAuth when:

Choose WardenAuth if you want authorization cloud-agnostic — run on AWS, GCP, Azure, or self-hosted. If you prefer a visual dashboard over a policy language, or need features Cedar/AVP does not provide: API key management, SoD constraints, audit trails, and webhooks.

Bottom line

Cedar is the best-designed authorization policy language available today — cleaner than Rego, purpose-built for the domain. If you're all-in on AWS, it's an excellent choice via Verified Permissions. If you need cloud-agnostic authorization with a full management platform, WardenAuth provides the same capabilities without the AWS lock-in.

See for yourself — no credit card required.

Start for free View all comparisons →

Other comparisons

vs Auth0 FGA (Okta FGA)vs WorkOSvs Permit.iovs Cerbosvs Ory Ketovs Casbinvs Open Policy Agent (OPA)vs AWS Verified Permissionsvs Building Your Own Zanzibarvs Styra DASvs SpiceDB (AuthZed)vs Keycloakvs Asertovs Topaz (Aserto OSS)vs Warrantvs Auth0 FGAvs WorkOSvs Permit.io
© 2026 ecarrizo. All rights reserved.
PricingDocsCompareBlogLearnChangelogStatusGlossaryContactTermsPrivacy